
Instruments & GearNeil Peart
Neil Peart’s Drum Kit, Tour by Tour
The Neil Peart drum kit is the most photographed drum setup in rock, and the reason is not size alone – plenty of drummers have owned more hardware. It is that the kit changed deliberately, in step with what Rush were writing, and that from 1984 it turned around. Here is the documented sequence: which manufacturers, which additions, and which tour each arrangement belonged to.
The four makers, in order
Peart played Slingerland, then Tama, then Ludwig, then Drum Workshop, in that order. His first kit with Rush was a silver Slingerland, in use from 1974. Tama followed through the middle period of the band, Ludwig came into the setup later, and DW became the primary manufacturer across the band’s later years, in several custom configurations. Snare drums track the same story: from 2112 (1976) through Counterparts (1993) he used a 5.5 by 14 inch Slingerland “Artist” model with a three-ply shell and eight lugs, switching for the Presto sessions to a Ludwig and a Solid Percussion piccolo.
Cymbals
Zildjian A-series cymbals, with Wuhan chinas, were the basis until the early 2000s. He then moved to Sabian and to the Paragon line, which the company created for him. That is an unusual arrangement: not an endorsement of an existing product but a range built to one player’s specification, which is a reasonable measure of where he sat in the industry by then.
The percussion, and what it was for
From the late 1970s the kit stopped being a drum kit. Orchestra bells, tubular bells, wind chimes, crotales, timbales, timpani, a gong, temple blocks, a bell tree, a triangle and melodic cowbells were all added. This is the period of A Farewell to Kings (1977) and Hemispheres (1978), when the band were writing side-long pieces that needed colour rather than more drums. A tubular bell is not there to be played fast. It is there because the arrangement has a gap where an orchestra would be.
1984: electronics, and the kit that turns
The change that gets photographed arrived with Grace Under Pressure (1984), where Simmons electronic drums entered the setup alongside Akai digital samplers. The samplers matter more than the pads: they let one drummer trigger the orchestral and keyboard textures a five-piece cannot otherwise reproduce on stage, which is how a three-piece band played the synthesizer-heavy material of that decade without hiring anyone.
And the riser. A 360-degree rotating drum riser appeared on the Grace Under Pressure tour in 1984, so that Peart could turn between the acoustic and the electronic halves of the kit during a performance rather than reaching across. It is usually described as showmanship. It is better understood as a seating problem: once a kit has two complete front faces, the only way to play both without compromising either is to rotate the player.
Later setups replaced the Simmons pads with Roland V-Drums, still feeding samplers, and a MalletKAT Express provided a MIDI mallet controller for the melodic parts. The logic did not change; the technology did.
Sticks
He designed a signature stick with Pro-Mark, the PW747W, made from Japanese shira kashi white oak. A small detail, but a telling one: white oak is denser and stiffer than the usual hickory, which suits a player working across a very large kit where reach and rebound matter more than comfort.
Why a three-piece needed all this
The kit is easier to understand if you hold Rush’s line-up in mind. Three musicians had to reproduce arrangements written with far more parts than three people can play, and each of them absorbed some of the surplus: the bassist took on keyboards and pedals, the guitarist took on textures, and the drummer took on everything an orchestra or a percussion section would otherwise have covered. Seen that way, the orchestra bells of the late 1970s and the samplers of the mid 1980s are the same decision made twice with different technology. The kit is not a collection. It is the missing members of the band.
What the kit does not tell you
A caution, because this subject attracts more invented detail than almost any other in the cluster. Complete tour-by-tour specifications circulate widely – every drum size, every cymbal placement, for every year – and most of that granularity is reconstructed from concert photographs by enthusiasts rather than published by the drummer or the manufacturers. The sequence of makers, the arrival of the electronics in 1984, the riser and the Sabian line are documented. The claim that a particular tom on a particular tour was a particular depth usually is not, so you will not find that level of detail here.
Where to hear each phase
The acoustic kit at full stretch: A Farewell to Kings and Hemispheres. The percussion collection as an arranging tool: the same two records. The hybrid kit: Grace Under Pressure and the albums that followed it. For the recorded solos there is my piece on Neil Peart’s drum solos.
Go deeper
The wider instrument survey is in the guide to prog rock gear, and the playing is covered in the best prog rock drummers and the best prog rock drum solos. For the band, start with the best Rush albums. The story of North American progressive rock, Rush included, is the subject of Beyond the Atlantic, the fourth book in my Beyond the Sound series.
Want the full story behind Rush and the American scene? The books map every era →
Enjoyed the read? Find your next one on the bookshelf below →
